Place-Based Research

There are representatives of more than 100 IGOs engaged in our project (see Team). They form the foundation of Place-Based Research Teams (PBRTs) which will lead the majority of the research activities of the Ărramăt project.  The PBRTs will include Indigenous leaders, elders, resource persons, graduate students/community researchers, and academic allies.

PBRTs will lead 146 projects in 44 regions in Canada/globally between Yr. 2-5. These regions are culturally, and ecologically significant.  They are representative of 70 “Key Biodiversity Areas” in Canada [1], all 15 Canadian ecozones [2], 11 of 14 global biomes [3], 10 of 12 marine ecoregions (global), and two of the world’s largest freshwater basins (Mackenzie, Amazon). Some may be defined as “refugia” (little disturbed) [4,5]; others are in “hot-spots” with at-risk wildlife (e.g., polar bear, white sturgeon, mountain gorilla [6,7]), habitats (e.g., sea-ice, tropical forests, grasslands), and where Indigenous Peoples are also under stress.

Through coordination of these projects, we will create synergies and learning opportunities that will far exceed those produced from singular studies. We use “place” to refer to the lands that have physical-spiritual value and cultural meaning to Indigenous Peoples involved in Ărramăt; their relationship to these places is interconnected with the economy, social relations, language and spirituality, health-wellbeing; as such place-based research facilitates holistic research and outcomes [8-10]. The specific places of research included in the project will be defined by IGOs in Yr.1, but are anticipated to include landscapes of combined ecological and health value but are also defined here as sites of resistance to colonization and social and environmental injustice [11-14].

References:

[1] Tollefson, J. One Million Species Face Extinction. Nature 20199.

[2] Chandler, M.J.; Lalonde, C. Cultural Continuity as a Hedge against Suicide in Canada’s First Nations. Transcultural psychiatry 199835, 191–219. 

[3] Egeland, G.M.; Harrison, G.G. Health Disparities: Promoting Indigenous Peoples’ Health through Traditional Food Systems and Self-Determination. Indigenous peoples’ food systems and well-being: interventions and policies for healthy communities 2013, 9–22. 

[4] Greenwood, M.; De Leeuw, S.; Lindsay, N.M. Determinants of Indigenous Peoples’ Health: Beyond the Social; Canadian Scholars, 2018; ISBN 1-77338-037-0.

[5] Parlee, B.; Berkes, F. Health of the Land, Health of the People: A Case Study on Gwich’in Berry Harvesting in Northern Canada. EcoHealth 20052, 127–137.

[6] Parlee, B.; O’Neil, J. “The Dene Way of Life”: Perspectives on Health from Canada’s North. Journal of Canadian Studies 200741, 112–133.

[7] Panelli, R. Beyond Foodscapes: Considering Geographies of Indigenous Well-Being. Health and Place 200915, 455–465.

[8] Ostrom, E. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science 2009325, 419–422.

[9] Agrawal, A. Dismantling the Divide between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge. Development and Change 199526, 413–439.

[10] Convention on Biological Diversity Post-2020 Global Biodiversity FrameworkL Discussion Paper; UNEP: Montreal, 2019;

[11] Kuhnlein, H. Biodiversity and Sustainability of Indigenous Peoples’ Foods and Diets.; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2012; pp. 118–125.

[12] Klein, J.T. Prospects for TransdisciplinarityFutures 200436, 515–526.

[13] Pictou, S. Decolonizing Decolonization: An Indigenous Feminist Perspective on the Recognition and Rights Framework. South Atlantic Quarterly 2020119, 371–391. 

[14] Convention on Biological Diversity The Ninth Trondheim Conference on Biodiversity; United Nations Environment Program: Montreal.

Translate »