On The Land

Overview

In community-based monitoring, community members receive the physical tools to use local and traditional knowledge in conservation. As opposed to methods where power is delegated by governmental bodies, communities often decide their own monitoring methods and priorities.

Example

• Community members use various tools and techniques such as camera traps, survey apps, audio recording units, water testing kits, etc., depending on the aspect of the land being monitored. For example, field protocols for standardized monitoring of caribou and reindeer can be established with harvesters, enabling comparisons within and across populations, over time, and spanning vast geographic regions. Through monitoring, harvesters and researchers can evaluate population health and detect changes, informing management decisions.
• Example research protocols: University of Calgary
• Rangifer Anatomy Website

Literature

• Popp, J. N., Priadka, P., & Kozmik, C. (2019). The rise of moose co-management and integration of Indigenous knowledge. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 24(2), 159-167.
• Kutz, S., Ducrocq, J., Cuyler, C., Elkin, B., Gunn, A., Kolpashikov, L., … & White, R. G. (2013). Standardized monitoring of Rangifer health during International Polar Year. Rangifer, 91-114.
• Macdonald, J. M., Robinson, C. J., Perry, J., Lee, M., Barrowei, R., Coleman, B., … & Douglas, M. (2021). Indigenous-led responsible innovation: lessons from co-developed protocols to guide the use of drones to monitor a biocultural landscape in Kakadu National Park, Australia. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 8(2), 300-319.